Saturday 15 December 2012

The Cities That Victory Forgot

Here at Raccoon Inc., there is one professional sports team that we really do feel truly sorry for.
In changing with their new winning ways, this "A" logo now stands for "Argonauts" and not the more traditional "Awful".
Now you may say to yourself, "Hey!  How come is it that you feel so bad about them?  They just won the Grey Cup, didn't they?  Why cry on their shoulder?"  The answer is simple: they get the short end of the stick.  I mean, they really get the short end of the stick.  In such a huge city as Toronto, they can win a championship and seemingly not even get noticed.  How do I know they're not getting noticed?  The moment they win the Grey Cup, I still hear their fans saying...
All Toronto wants is a winner!  Why can't Toronto just have a winning team for once?
What?  The Argos just won the Grey Cup!  How much more winning can you get?  How could it possibly be all that bad?  So then I wondered: is Toronto all that bad off, or as bad off as they're whining about?  I came up with this experiment.

What you see below you is the winning percentage for every North American city that has two or more professional sports in descending order.  Say you're a sports fan.  Say you want to watch a game at your local professional sports franchise.  Say you go and buy a ticket to that game.  What you see here is the percentage likelihood that a team each of these major sports cities (Sorry Regina and Green Bay...) will win that game.  This information takes into account every single game played by every team in the NBA, MLB, NFL, CFL, NHL, and MLS in the last ten years.  To be fair, this also includes the non-games caused by lockouts.
"Fair enough," says Gary.

 And here's the list.  Please bear in mind that this took a while to compile, too!

Indianapolis  60.4%
Boston  58.3%
Dallas  55.9%
San Jose  54.7%
San Diego  54.2%
Nashville  53.7%
Calgary  53.5%
Montreal  53.0%
Philadelphia  52.9%
Pittsburgh  52.5%
New Orleans  52.4%
Baltimore  51.7%
Denver  51.4%
Seattle  51.1%
New Jersey  51.0%
Los Angeles  50.8%
Houston  50.7%
Chicago  50.5%
Detroit  49.3%
New York  49.3%
Salt Lake City  48.9%
Vancouver  48.9%
Phoenix  48.5%
Tampa  48.1%
Atlanta  47.8%
San Fransisco  47.7%
Minneapolis  47.5%
Miami  47.4%
Columbus  46.9%
Cincinnati  46.7%
Milwaukee  46.7%
Edmonton  46.4%
Buffalo  46.3%
Portland  46.3%
Toronto  45.8%
St. Louis  45.8%
Kansas City  45.7%
Washington  45.0%
Ottawa  44.9%
Cleveland  44.4%
Winnipeg  44.0%
Charlotte  43.9%
Oakland  43.4%

So with all this said and done, does Toronto still suck?  Mmyeah, but it could be worse: they could be Oakland.
"Fair enough," says Rollie.
My advice for Toronto fans who feel hard done by and want winning teams to be able to cheer for is simple and effective.
Embrace the dark side of the force.
Thank you and good night.

Friday 14 December 2012

Random Word Wednesday

Good evening!  I really wanted to write something tonight, but, darn it, I can't think of anything good, so I thought I'd try a random word night again to get the old creative juices flowing.  So kick back, relax, and be amazed!  By stuff!  Enjoy!


BET


In 1960, a write by the name of Theodore Geisel and his publisher Bennett Cerf, one of the co-founders of Random House, got to talking.  The result of their conversation was a wager that Cerf had made to Geisel.  Geisel had just written a book using only 225 words, but Cerf made the wager that Geisel wouldn't be able to write a successful book using only 50 distinct words or less.  Geisel took on the bet and after some difficulty the story was completed and within the fifty words.  The 225 word book that Geisel, better known as Dr. Seuss, had written was The Cat in the Hat.  The 50 word book was Green Eggs and Ham.  They were indeed successful books.  Cerf never did make good on the bet.


COMPOSITION

Dmitri Shostakovich has one of the coolest nicknames of any classical composer.  It's also one that can be taken both literally and figuratively.  The Fireman of St. Petersburg!  Neat, huh?  The young composer had already accomplished much in his short career had become the darling of the Soviet machine, fallen out of favour, and then became the darling again.  All before the age of 32!  He was hard at work during the build up to war, but when it finally broke out, he attempted to enlist in the military, but due to his poor eyesight (see above picture for details) he was denied.  Instead he enlisted as a volunteer firefighter.  As war pushed into Russia it all became an inspiration to him and he completed his finest, and longest work, his Symphony #7.  It's a great, powerful symphony that, officially, represents the struggle of the people of St. Petersburg's desperate defense against the invading German forces.  At a time when his people were seeing their darkest days, Shostakovich was there writing the music that put out the fires of terror to give them hope that their enemy was not invincible and could be beaten.  But then he was denounced again in 1948.  There really was no pleasing the Soviet Union.


WIRE

This was before I was thought of, but there was a time, and not too terribly long ago, when even the newest, latest and greatest inventions were encased in giant teak boxes.  Two pounds of consumer electronics for ever forty pounds of miniature, yet stylish, coffin.  For example, the wire recorder.  Originally invented in 1890 by Danish engineer Valdemar Poulsen, the wire recorder was widely used as an audio recording device from the 1920's until 1954 when the magnetic cassette tape, an improvement on the wire recorder's basic design, became commercially viable for the masses.  The wire recorder consisted of an audio receiver (either for dictation or recording phone conversations) that picked up sound waves which were transmitted to a magnetic head.  A wire was drawn across the head and the sound waves were recorded on the wire via magnetic transcendence and it was reeled up again in a spool that resembled fishing line.  Ingenious!  The giant wooden box, however, was purely ornamental.


MONTH

What are each of the months named after?  Good question!

January - The Roman God Janus, good of doorways, since every January you open the door of a new year.
February - The Roman purification festival Februa.  It essentially amounts to spring cleaning.
March - Originally the first month of the year, it was named after Mars to signify the new military campaign season.  Romans loved their wars.
April - Meh.  No one really knows for sure, but a good guess is that it comes from aperire, which means "to open", as in bud on flowers and trees.
May - The Greek goddess Maia.  Her purview was fertility, hubba hubba!
June - There are a couple probable sources, but most likely Juno, Roman goddess of marriage, which makes sense following Maia.
July - Julius Caesar!
August - Augustus Caesar!
September - Septemus Caesar!  ...  Actually, no.  It just means "Seven".
October - Eight.
November - Nine.
December - Ten.  It really gets boring after August, unfortunately.  A new renaming is fine by me!


AFTERNOON

Fredo and Michael Corleone (pictured above) work together to continue their father Vito's criminal empire as...  Er...  No wait.  Hold on.  Let me start over.

Sonny and his friend Sal (pictured above) work together to knock over the First Brooklyn Bank in the 1975 suspenseful crime drama Dog Day Afternoon.  The purpose of the heist is to pay for a sex change (male to female) operation Sonny's partner Leon, rather than, you know, any sort of financial security for his actual legal wife Angie.  So given the plot, this is a very interesting film for 1975.  Sonny has no shortage of charisma and when the heist starts to go south and turns into a hostage standoff, he soon has the mob outside the bank on his side as he plays them to his advantage.  The thing that I love most about it that while I can understand and appreciate Sonny's character, he does just the right amount of bad things to make himself unsympathetic.  It's like eating a dish that has five things in it that you like and one thing that you don't and there's always just enough of that thing you don't in it to turn you off of it.  Brilliant movie.


LEGEND

The legend of Prester John is a very interesting one.  From the 12th through 17th centuries there was a legend in Europe of a great, wise, generous, yet fabulously wealthy Christian king named Prester John that ruled over a land that was somewhere deep inside pagan or Muslim lands far, far away.  It was also said that he was a direct descendant of one of the Three Magi, or the wise men that came to visit Jesus at his birth, so there were many great reasons why European leaders wanted to seek out and find him.  So confident were they that they started putting his kingdom on maps, though they only had a vague idea of where he was.  He was always just somewhere over there.  Somewhere deep behind enemy lines where reliable information is impossible to get for a Christian.  At first his kingdom was in Persia where they had infrequent contact with the Nestorian church.  Or maybe eastern Anatolia in Turk lands beyond the grasp of the Byzantines.  Or maybe, as the Mongols invaded westward, he was somewhere in the swirling, mysterious, seemingly endless expanse of Central Asia.  Or maybe, as the Portuguese began to make the world smaller, buried somewhere in the ancient darkness of Ethiopia.  In the end the legend of Prestor John was indeed just that: a legend and nothing more.


ANGUISH

"Anguish" is, as a matter of fact, a philosophical term.  Pretend for a moment that you take a day off work and you have nothing planned at all.  You can do anything you want.  You can go out, or you can stay in.  It's up to you.  So you decide to have a shower, get dressed and go for a walk.  You head out to a forest and explore for a while, enjoying your freedom.  As you go exploring you find a cliff nearby and you walk up to the edge.  You take a peek over and see some water far below realizing that should you take a step off the cliff the fall would surely be fatal, so you step back to a safe distance.  Now think about this moment a minute.  There's nobody around anywhere, you're not at work, no cell phone, no nothing.  Right now you can do anything you want to do.  You could play in the grass, start a fire, jump through the trees, continue exploring along - even leap to your death.  However, while there are so many things that you can do, you only have the one day off from work to do them.  That sort of constricting feeling that is the conflict between all this freedom that you have in your life and the pressures and constraints that you put upon yourself or are pressed upon you by the universe that you necessarily exist in is the definition of philosophical anguish.


SIXTEEN

Man, if only they had cameras back then.  If only.  Let's see how many bad jokes I can make at the expense of Louis XVI.
- Louis!  This whole revolution thing will calm down over time.  No reason to lose your head over it.
- This show of support was rather uplifting for Louis.  Well, his head was uplifted at any rate.
- The uprising had Louis beside himself.  Literally!
- When Louis asked for a little off the top his barber strangely seemed a little too eager to please.
- The head of state surveyed the ecstatic mob - the body of state, not so much.
- It was a real weight off of Louis' shoulders now that the rebels' demands had been satisfied.
- Boy, if Louis thought that the revolution was a pain in the neck before...
- Louis was up to his neck in problems with the rebels, which is natural since that was the end of the line.
 - When Louis demanded a guillotine demonstration to be done for the rebels this wasn't what he meant.
I think that's just about enough of that.


MILEAGE

Meet author and retired British submarine captain Gavin Menzies.  He is a major proponent (originator?) of the theory that in 1421 AD Chinese admiral Zheng He and his fleet set sail from China to explore not just the coastline of the Indian subcontinent, but the entire world.  Supposedly backed by Ming Dynasty Emperor Zhu Di with massive treasure ships their real mission was to head out and collect tribute from everyone, and if a fleet came along that massive and that advanced as Menzies is stating, then you betcha they were going to give tribute out of fear.  Furthermore, it is Menzies's contention that not only did Zheng He's fleet sail to India, but around the south coast of Africa, the east coast of North America, and up the entire west coast of both of the Americas.  Oh, he has more theories (Zheng He's fleet touching off the Renaissance and Atlantis being a product of the Minoans who themselves circumnavigated the world), but serious scholars politely call fiction.


ALTOGETHER

Armand Jean du Plessis, cardinal-duc de Richelieu et de Fronsac's name has taken up over half the first line of this last entry.  To match his big name this frenchman also achieved big things.  He entered the church and by the age of 23, presto!, he was made a bishop.  By the age of 31, shazam!, he was the Secretary of State for France.  By the age of 37, a la peanut butter sandwiches!, he was a cardinal.  So as you can see not only was he a politician, but he was a fine politician.  In fact, so great was he that he is considered to he the world's first First Minister, or Prime Minister as we understand it today, which is a pretty significant achievement in itself.  Among many, many other accomplishments, he was a great patron of the arts and also a huge advocate of keeping Quebec French!  Imagine that!  Oh, and to be perfectly honest, because Cardinal Richelieu was certainly a real live flesh and blood person, it wasn't until I wrote this last piece here that I had discovered that the Three Musketeers of "All for One and One for All" fame were actually a work of fiction.  Good night!

Saturday 1 December 2012

Words in past tense that start with "B"!

Good evening!  Tonight we pay tribute to words in the past tense that start with "b"!  Ready?  I know I am!  Enjoy!


BOUNCED!

Before I begin, here's the soundtrack to this article.  Remember: it was just a matter of time.

I've written a fair share about...
Look at that face.  Would that face lie to you?
...his worship Rob Ford.  Not all of it has been flattering.
Classic!  It sums everything up in one pic.
Now, I'm not a Toronto resident.  Not even close!  The closest I've ever been is in Guelph and even then at the time...
Mayor Mel!  Yaaaaaaaaaaay!
...was in charge.  There's just something about Ford, though, that captures my imagination.  I was watching Twitter like a hawk furiously hammering the mouse to see the new tweets on #robford to find the decision of the court ruling Monday.  

And then it happened.  And I was shocked.  But I should haven't have been because as the ruling came out and you went through all of the moving parts involved, a reasonable thinking person would come away with the conclusion that the judge took a look at every out the mayor had from getting bounced and reasoned it out.  Was the amount in question negligible?  The mayor himself said no on the stand.  Was the conflict of interest inadvertentNot really since he spoke to it in front of council, voted on it in council, and admitted straight up and down that he's never even read the conflict of interest guidelines.  There was just no way that a reasonable thinking person could look at the laws involved, look at the context, look at the mayor's actions and come away with the conclusion that he did it by any form of accident.

There is no part of kicking...
...Coach Ford...
...out of office that bothers me because the law as written says that if you get caught in a conflict of interest then off with your head.  Is the punishment too severe?  Maybe.  Is it a sledgehammer to swat a fruit fly?  Maybe.  Is the law, as has been said many times this week, a bad one?  Maybe.  Here's the thing that bothers me about this.

There's so much talk from the pundits that it's just not fair that X many hundred thousand citizens of Toronto voted for him, and one unelected judge tossed him out.  It's undemocratic that one activist judge...
Activism?  Not on my watch!
can undo the will of an entire city.  It's unCanadian.  It's...
...Tadjikistanian.
Well, the editorial board here at Raccoon Inc. is here to say that this argument is preposterous to the point of insult.  The inference here is that this one judge holds the weight of the entire city in their hands like some sort of medieval autocratic Doge that do whatever it is they want with it.  They don't like Ford?  He's gone.  They like Ford?  He stays.  This is not the case at all in the least.

Let's be clear: judges don't write laws.  Some people may not understand this, so I'll say it again.  Judges don't write laws.  Legislators write laws.  They are the ones that write the laws that govern society whether at...
...the federal level..,
...the provincial level...
...or the municipal level.
Legislators are democratically elected.  Judges are people that are selected as sound interpreters of the laws that the democratically elected legislators enact.  So how is it then that a judge ruling that a conflict of interest has taken place and that the mayor's seat has been declared empty is somehow undemocratic when it was democratically elected people that created the rule in the first place?  It's an argument that holds as much water as...
...a Maple Leafs goaltender.
Now, I don't think that I'm particularly anti-Ford.  He was elected, his big plank is that he wanted to cut the budget and he did.  He's also a mess, but everyone knew that going in.  The box of goods that is "Rob Ford" was clearly labeled years before his mayoral run.
Fords may be boxy, but it's what's on the inside that counts.
People already knew that in exchange for leaner goverment came a circus, so whatever.

One last thing on this.  Today councilor Sherrey Carroll announced that "I could run this city a damn sight better" than Ford and that she'd be putting her name in to replace him.  Hm.  I suppose that that the downside of being the populist, average Joe, Johnny Punchclock candidate is that you are inherently also replaceable by anyone else by virtue of the admission that you're no one special.  Being the everyman is a fine card to play when you're popular, not so much when you've just been booted from office.

Best of luck, Rob!  You'll need it.


BLASTED!

And here's the next song for this item on the list.

If your, say, basketball team lost 138-9 that would be pretty bad, huh?  This week saw a crucial UN vote that would see the Palestine recognized as a non-member state in the United Nations which was passed by that tally: 138 for, 9 against with 41 abstentions.  One of the group of nine was us!  Canada!  Yay!

Now, I will say this.  I can understand, appreciate, and even respect one very solid reason why Canada voted against this resolution.  And it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Middle East.
Le belle provence.
Which makes sense, right?  If portions of nations go unilaterally declaring themselves states to the United Nations, what next?
The Republic of Alberta Welcomes You!
The Confederate States of America Welcomes You!
The Grand Duchy of New Jersey Welcomes You!
So, it's no great shock that Canada would be opposed to the resolution for this reason.  For the same reason I would assume that the United Kingdom would be opposed (Northern Ireland, Scotland), as well as Spain (the Basque region), Russia (Chechnya), and Belgium (Wallonia).  Except that wasn't what happened.  Of each of those countries with similar vested interests, only Canada voted against.  The United Kingdom abstained and the rest voted for the resolution.  I would like to reiterate that Spain with all of its grief with ETA and the Basque separatists voted for this resolution.  What is wrong with them?  You know what?  Tune them in, Johnny.
"This resolution will not advance the cause of peace or spur a return to negotiations.
Will the Palestinian people be better off as a result? No.
On the contrary, this unilateral step will harden positions and raise unrealistic expectations...
...while doing nothing to improve the lives of the Palestinian people."
Mm.  O.k.  I can see one really good reason why Canada would vote against the resolution, but in Foreign Minister John Baird's statement at the UN I saw no real mention of that or reference to it.  Instead what I gleaned was the message that the Palestinians must sit down, shut up, and wait their turn.  I'm not really pro-Israel or anti-Isreal, but I get the feeling that if a Québec-style referendum was done amongst Palestinians that they would vote overwhelmingly for sovereignty.  It's not a place like Québec or even Scotland where those who want sovereignty are a rabble rousing minority, but rather they are a real great big wad of people.

I also get the feeling that no one's right and no one's wrong.  I wouldn't completely support Israel because it seems like they're bullies.  I wouldn't completely support the Palestinians because of the indiscriminate terrorism they espouse.  Whatever they were doing up until this point has not been working, and you would have to be willfully blind not to see that.

Furthermore, with this resolution what the Palestinians have accomplished was a) non-violent and b) with a resounding nod of approval from the rest of the world's nations.  What's so wrong about that?  No rockets were fired, no government ministers were kidnapped and executed.  It was just a play by the Palestinians to breakup the log jam with Israel and procure themselves some negotiating power, again in a non-violent, globally approved method.

I guess I just don't see why Canada has such a love affair with Israel.  I get it that they are a rare developed, democratic Middle Eastern nation, which is laudable and ought to be protected, but not at the expense of the liberty of another nation.  Israeli hands are not clean.  Neither are Palestinian hands.  As Baird said, this has gone on for seven decades.  How much has improved?  Not much.  Maybe a new process is a good idea.  It sure couldn't hurt to try!

Oh, and lastly...
This Christmas why not get the John Baird action figure?  It's loudmouthed, finger pointing fun for the whole family!
Order yours today!


BOASTED!

And music for this entry is right here.

Guess where I'm going with this one.
Metaphor, perhaps?
Yes, this week The Onion declared...  Wait.  Let's get this right.  This week The Onion declared that in addition to being First Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea, First Chairman of the National Defense Commission, Supreme Commander of the Korean People's Army, and Supreme Leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-Un is also now the Sexiest Man Alive.

Ah, the Onion.
Uh huh.
Mmhmm.
Nice.
Yes, The Onion delivered the B.S. with such a straight face and so masterfully done that the Chinese bought it.  The suckers reported it as news!  And they didn't just give him a nice glossy center-fold to gawk at.  Oh no.  They gave him a fifty-five page spread!
I beg your pardon.
Fifty-five pages.
Fifty-five?
Fifty-five, Bob.  Fifty-five pages of...
Oooooo...
Ahhhhh...
Seriously, though, he's definitely not the ugliest brutal dictator I've ever seen.  I would think even that the adjective "cherubic" applies somewhat.  No, there are definitely far more hideous dictators out there.  For example...
Eeyah, those are eyebrows!
I'll keep going in the same category and take Eyebrows for $1,000, Alex.
Pol Pot did not collect $10.00 because he did not get 2nd place in a beauty contest.  Or 3rd...  Or 4th...
I could certainly add more to this list, but I think that after all the Baird pictures I've included the ugly quotient in this edition has long since been past.  So, before we damage anyone's eyeballs any further, I will bid you all...
Goof night!